Cryptographic Primitives

Eni6ma Technology and the Rosario-Wang Proof/Cypher is Patent Pending. USPTO 2024. Copyright 2024 All right reserved. Eni6ma.org - Dylan Rosario

Cryptographic primitives form the foundational building blocks of modern cryptography, serving as the fundamental tools and techniques for securing digital communication, data integrity, and identity authentication in the digital age. These primitives encompass a diverse range of cryptographic algorithms, protocols, and mechanisms designed to achieve various security objectives, such as confidentiality, integrity, authenticity, and non-repudiation. At their core, cryptographic primitives leverage mathematical principles and computational techniques to transform plaintext information into ciphertext, ensuring that sensitive data remains protected from unauthorized access and manipulation.

The concept of cryptographic primitives encompasses essential cryptographic operations, including encryption, decryption, hashing, digital signatures, and key management. Encryption algorithms encode plaintext data into ciphertext, rendering it unintelligible to unauthorized parties without the corresponding decryption key. Hash functions generate fixed-size digest values from arbitrary input data, facilitating data integrity verification and password hashing. Digital signatures provide a means for authenticating the origin and integrity of digital messages, while key management protocols enable secure key distribution and exchange. Together, these cryptographic primitives form the backbone of secure communication systems, safeguarding sensitive information in various domains, from financial transactions and healthcare records to government communications and online privacy.

  • One-way Hash Functions (e.g., SHA-256, MD5): One-way hash functions are cryptographic algorithms that take an input (or message) and produce a fixed-size output, called a hash value or digest. These functions are designed to be computationally easy to compute in one direction (from input to hash) but computationally infeasible to reverse (from hash to input), making it difficult to reconstruct the original input from its hash. Common examples include SHA-256 and MD5. One-way hash functions are widely used in digital signatures, password storage, and data integrity verification.

  • Symmetric Encryption Algorithms (e.g., AES, DES): Symmetric encryption algorithms use the same key for both encryption and decryption of data. The key must be kept secret between the communicating parties. These algorithms are fast and efficient, making them suitable for encrypting large amounts of data. Advanced Encryption Standard (AES) and Data Encryption Standard (DES) are examples of symmetric encryption algorithms. In AES, data is encrypted in blocks of 128 bits using keys of various lengths (128, 192, or 256 bits), while DES operates on 64-bit blocks with a 56-bit key.

  • Asymmetric Encryption Algorithms (e.g., RSA, Elliptic Curve Cryptography): Asymmetric encryption algorithms use two related keys, a public key for encryption and a private key for decryption. The keys are mathematically linked, but deriving the private key from the public key is computationally infeasible. RSA (Rivest-Shamir-Adleman) and Elliptic Curve Cryptography (ECC) are examples of asymmetric encryption algorithms. RSA involves the use of large prime numbers for key generation and is widely used in secure communication protocols. ECC operates on elliptic curves over finite fields and offers equivalent security with smaller key sizes compared to RSA.

  • Digital Signatures (e.g., RSA, DSA): Digital signatures provide a means for verifying the authenticity and integrity of digital messages or documents. They are created using asymmetric encryption algorithms, where the sender signs the message with their private key, and the recipient verifies the signature using the sender's public key. RSA and Digital Signature Algorithm (DSA) are commonly used for digital signatures. RSA signatures involve encrypting a hash of the message with the sender's private key, while DSA generates signatures using a random number and a private key.

  • Key Exchange Protocols (e.g., Diffie-Hellman, ECDH): Key exchange protocols allow two parties to establish a shared private key over an insecure communication channel. Diffie-Hellman key exchange is a popular example, where both parties agree on a shared secret without explicitly exchanging the secret itself. The Elliptic Curve Diffie-Hellman (ECDH) protocol is a variant that operates on elliptic curve cryptography and offers similar functionality with smaller key sizes.

  • Zero-Knowledge Proofs: Zero-knowledge proofs allow one party (the prover) to prove to another party (the verifier) that they possess certain knowledge or information without revealing the actual information itself. The proof demonstrates the validity of the statement without disclosing any additional information beyond what is being proven. Zero-knowledge proofs are used in various cryptographic protocols, such as authentication and identity verification, where privacy and confidentiality are paramount.

  • Commitment Schemes: Commitment schemes allow a party to commit to a chosen value or message without revealing the value itself. The commitment is binding and cannot be changed once made, but it remains concealed until the party decides to reveal it. Commitment schemes are used in cryptographic protocols like secure multiparty computation, where parties need to commit to their inputs before jointly computing a function without revealing their inputs prematurely.

  • Homomorphic Encryption: Homomorphic encryption is a cryptographic technique that allows computations to be performed on encrypted data without decrypting it first. This enables privacy-preserving computations on sensitive data while maintaining confidentiality. Homomorphic encryption schemes come in different flavors, including partially homomorphic encryption (allowing either addition or multiplication operations) and fully homomorphic encryption (allowing both addition and multiplication operations).

  • Secure Multi-Party Computation: Secure multi-party computation (MPC) allows multiple parties to jointly compute a function over their private inputs without revealing their inputs to each other. The goal is to compute the function's result while preserving the privacy of each party's input. MPC protocols typically involve cryptographic techniques like secret sharing, secure function evaluation, and commitment schemes to achieve this goal.

  • Pseudo-Random Number Generators (PRNGs): Pseudo-random number generators are algorithms that produce sequences of numbers that appear random but are generated using a deterministic process. These generators are widely used in cryptography for generating cryptographic keys, initialization vectors, and other parameters. Cryptographically secure PRNGs must pass stringent statistical tests to ensure that their output is indistinguishable from true randomness, making them suitable for cryptographic applications.

Last updated